| To: | topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40 |
| From: | Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Dec 2020 05:55:58 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
> IMHO, for that number, on-the-ground radials do not need to be anywhere near > that long. Personally, I subscribe to the same-length-as-the-vertical > guideline. The only thing about this I advise in the way of a change is something W1BB recommended, which was that the radials on the ground going out underneath the horizontal L wire should be as long as the horizontal wire. My horizontal component has some bends in it and I routed around 10 radials under it to follow it. It probably doesn't make much difference, but it isn't that hard to run a few that are under the wire all the way out. 73 Rob K5UJ _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40’ x 143’, four 100’ radials, #14 wire., Artek Manuals |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: I identified signal on 1.825 MHz this morning, Don Kirk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40, Artek Manuals |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40, Jim Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |