Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40
From: Artek Manuals <Manuals@ArtekManuals.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:57:08 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Especially if you have elevated radials you will need a choke otherwise the coax and your shack will become part of the ground plane. . In my case I have a choke ( for common mode currents) and UNUN to match the 25 ohm impedance of the antenna to 50 ohms. In some installations the common modes� can be quite large . The choke on my� 60'-"t" is eight ft-240-31 cores with 4 turns of coax. At 4 cores, the cores would get hot enough after 10 minutes at legal limit that were too hot to touch. With ground mounted radials the common mode problem is usually a lot lower.


YMMV
Dave
NR1DX

On 12/10/2020 2:17 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 12/10/2020 4:33 AM, Rob Atkinson wrote:
I've never understood what is gained by using a balun at the feedpoint
in this application.�� The feedline is unbalanced as is the load.
What's the point of a balun.

That's the problem with the word "balun." A CHOKE is needed at the feedpoint so that the feedline does not become a radial.

73, Jim K9YC
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

--
Dave Manuals@ArtekManuals.com www.ArtekManuals.com


--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>