So you would like to shut down all discussion because the 'science is
settled'. Good factual discussion is important, but you see it as not
getting along. I disagree.
Doug
"The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein
-----Original Message-----
Cheating is cheating. How many people used remote stations, exceeded
their power limits, etc. Singling out a mode because you are upset
that it has taken away activity in your preferred mode is not helpful
to the hobby. Not everyone that use FT8 cheats. Not everyone that
uses a amp that exceeds their legal limit uses it in that fashion.
How can you guarantee that everyone on the "Honor Role" was 100 percent
honorable or even anyone that got DXCC did it right? You can't so
please stop singling out a mode you don't care for. We get it. Move
on. It is here. Just like the Reverse beacon, packet cluster, etc.
We are all hams enjoying many aspects of the hobby. Can't we get along?
W0MU
On 8/2/2019 3:03 AM, Ross Johnson wrote:
To Carl , my computer is not cleaver enough to work 60 countries FT8
on its own.
I have to check grey line, put many hours in on band, check
DXpeditions ETC
Don’t forget hardware and radio gear.
To Nick and George. K1JT has put out a list identifying call signs
they believe are using automated stations, you cant tell me others
have not cheated. There was callsigns mentioned on these pages recently.
To problem solver Kevin K3OX ,you have helped some here by pointing
out Mix DXCC is not CW DXCC or SSB DXCC
Well done
73 Ross ZL3RJ
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector