I can't speak to all the technical details of this discussion, but I can say
that I've had a very good experience with the SAL-12, despite having very
difficult terrain. My SAL is partly over concrete and partly over dirt; partly
over a level surface and partly over a steep downhill slope; and partly in the
clear and partly threaded through the shrubbery. Because of all that (and my
impatience to try it out), it took several weekends of readjusting before I got
it just right. And of course, the feedline has to be protected by chokes
against common mode noise. But now that I have all that done, it performs very
well.
I seriously considered the WF, but I think it's too big an engineering project
for me. I was able to erect the SAL-12 by myself, and the only risky moment
was a result of my own thoughtlessness. But read the instructions through a
couple times before you start!
-- Art Delibert, KB3FJO
________________________________
From: Topband <topband-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of n4is@n4is.com
<n4is@n4is.com>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2018 3:44 PM
To: 'Jay Terleski'; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 192, Issue 33
Jay
The SAL is only one electrical equivalent loop with 9 db RDF, the Waller
Flag has 2 flags in phase with 11.5 db RDF.
It is not on the same class. Sorry but I am been honest here, both antennas
need the tower to be detuned to work.
The invention of a BALUN just transfer the impedance replacing a resistor
1000 ohms to load the loop as any FLAG, the other BALUN you call a special
name to patent, it is just a simple BALUN, it is just the feed line , the
SAL does have one resistor and one feed point, the two vertical wires works
like a very short transmission line. And it removed does not affect
anything, You own engineer admitted that.
To prove that it is no the same class, check the side null, two flags can
provide a deep null on each side , 30 db , and 20 db F/B.
Does your SAL provide side null, 82 degree front lob,. 11.5 db RDF and it is
ground independent? NO.
Can you elevate it and turn.it? NO
The SAL is grounded dependent and can not be elevated and turned.. Sorry
the SAL is identical a K9AY, build them side by side and you will see it.
The HWF is at another level because cancel manmade noise and the increase on
signal to noise ratio improvement is 20 db or better.
You get what you pay for. I can tell you that the SAL is really a Snake Oil.
Work 300 countries with a SAL and I will give you some credit.
73.
JC
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband <topband-bounces@contesting.com> On Behalf Of Jay Terleski
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2018 12:20 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 192, Issue 33
JC said,
The SAL is a good antenna, any directivity increases signal to noise ratio.
The RDF is 2 to 3 bd better than the vertical antenna, it means the
improvement on signal to noise ratio is about 6db. You can dig signals 6 db
below noise with the SAL that you cannot hear with the inverted L.
>
> ..but the SAL has the same performance of a K9AY, or EWE or a single
FLAG, The clamed 10 db RDF was never confirmed or measured, The SAL is the
most complicated K9AY you can build. The separation in two loops does not
change the directivity.
>
> You can phase 2 FLAGS to increase RDF to 11.5 DB, as well you can
> phase
two K9AY or 4 if you want, but the SAL phasing system is complicated and it
is impractical to phase two SAL to increase RDF.
>
> 73
> JC
> N4IS
JC the SAL is not in the class of the single terminated loops of the K9AY
antenna, and you of all people should know this as it is in the same class
as your waller loop in that it uses two loops do derive the pattern. in
each of the 4 directions. And combines the loops to get the intermediate
directivity in 8 directions. It is a fantastice ground independent antenna
and we can't hardly keep them in stock. As to your claim that the RDF has
not been confirmed is also wrong. It has been run on many simulation
platforms and I am sure you have studied it well.
We have a Yahoo group that you may join and get the NEC models and you may
feel free to join it as well.
The SAL is a fantastic antenna, and if one takes time to optimize it, it
will give the performance you see on the videos on You Tube, etc. It
doesn't suffer from huge low gain problems of the HWF you sell, and is much
more cost effective for the small guys to get a good low band antenna
working to share DXing on top band as well as others as it is very broad
banded.
Due to it's gain, we do not need exotic amplification the the HWF requires.
And we publish the details so a customer may build their own successfully.
Try the SAL-30/20/12 guys, I have two of them up now and plan to phase them,
as one of my customers has done.
Thanks for reading and Happy New Year to the group.
Jay, WX0B
Jay Terleski
Array Solutions
214 954 7140
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 11:00 AM <topband-request@contesting.com> wrote:
> Send Topband mailing list submissions to
> topband@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> topband-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> topband-owner@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Topband digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Inverted L improvement question (Cecil Acuff)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 10:31:56 -0600
> From: Cecil Acuff <chacuff@cableone.net>
> To: n4is@n4is.com
> Cc: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>, Arthur Delibert
> <radio75a3@msn.com>, Jeff Woods <jmwooods@yahoo.com>, topband
> <topband@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: Topband: Inverted L improvement question
> Message-ID: <592429B6-A654-473E-88E6-62EBBF643031@cableone.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> I would have kept mine if I had seen that kind of performance. Either
> I have a very low noise floor, I had degraded performance of the RX
> antenna for some reason or I was doing something wrong. When I saw a
> difference in SNR it was very minor and wouldn?t have been the
> deciding factor in making the contact. It had a bit less loss than my
> K9AY but there was more wire in the air. Difficult to erect...wife
> helped but fell once before we got it right.
>
> I don?t expect my experience was typical so not wanting to dissuade
> others...the SAL antennas are good antennas....but I didn?t see the
> performance displayed on the Array Solutions web site video at this
> location.
>
> Cecil
> K5DL
>
> Sent using recycled electrons.
>
> > On Dec 28, 2018, at 10:21 AM, <n4is@n4is.com> <n4is@n4is.com> wrote:
> >
> > Wes you're right
> >
> > The SAL is a good antenna, any directivity increases signal to noise
> ratio. The RDF is 2 to 3 bd better than the vertical antenna, it means
> the improvement on signal to noise ratio is about 6db. You can dig
> signals 6 db below noise with the SAL that you cannot hear with the
inverted L.
> >
> > ..but the SAL has the same performance of a K9AY, or EWE or a
> > single
> FLAG, The clamed 10 db RDF was never confirmed or measured, The SAL
> is the most complicated K9AY you can build. The separation in two
> loops does not change the directivity.
> >
> > You can phase 2 FLAGS to increase RDF to 11.5 DB, as well you can
> > phase
> two K9AY or 4 if you want, but the SAL phasing system is complicated
> and it is impractical to phase two SAL to increase RDF.
> >
> > 73
> > JC
> > N4IS
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Topband <topband-bounces@contesting.com> On Behalf Of Wes
> > Stewart
> > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2018 10:50 AM
> > To: Arthur Delibert <radio75a3@msn.com>; Jeff Woods
> > <jmwooods@yahoo.com>
> > Cc: topband <topband@contesting.com>
> > Subject: Re: Topband: Inverted L improvement question
> >
> > I was an early participant in the SAL yahoo group and introduced
> > Dan,
> AC6LA, to the group. He has provided a lot of modeling tools.
> >
> > That said, I lost interest after feeling that the design was too
> complicated, not well understood and suffered from a dizzying number
> of changes. I could be totally wrong about this, but that was my
> assessment some time ago and frankly I haven't kept up.
> >
> > Wes N7WS
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 12/27/2018 4:15 PM, Arthur Delibert wrote:
> >> You may also want to check out the SAL-12, -20 or -30 antennas from
> >> Array Solutions. My yard is pretty small, but I was able to put up
> >> a SAL-12, and I love it. (I do mostly 49-, 60- and 90-meter SWBC
> >> DX.) I can switch the antenna to any one of 8 different directions,
> >> and I'm often surprised to find that the DX is coming from a
> >> direction
> different from what I would expect.
> >> Often there's a very pronounced peak in the signal when the antenna
> >> is pointed in the right direction, and I really would not have had
> >> any copy if I couldn't point in that direction.
> >>
> >> The SAL-12 isn't especially good on 160, but is good from 3 MHz and
> >> higher. The SAL-20 and -30 are reportedly very good on 160. If I
> >> recall right, the
> >> SAL-20 is directional up to 20 meters; the SAL-30 is good up to 40
> >> meters. Check the Array Solutions website to confirm.
> >>
> >> These aren't as cheap as putting up your own pennant, but above 3
> >> MHz, the
> >> SAL-12 aimed NE almost always outperforms my pennant pointed in the
> >> same direction.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Art Delibert, KB3FJO
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ---
> >> ----------
> >
> > _________________
> > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
> >
> > _________________
> > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Topband mailing list
> Topband@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Topband Digest, Vol 192, Issue 33
> ****************************************
>
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|