Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters

To: n4is@n4is.com
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
From: "w5zn@w5zn.org" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:45:23 -0600
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Thanks JC. LoTW does in fact require a QSO check from the other station for the 
confirmation to occur. Unless the other station uploads QSO details a 
confirmation does not occur. 

I’m not suggesting there hasn’t been bogus activity but I can tell you if there 
is proof a flaw or breach has occurred with the LoTW system ARRL will address 
it.

73 Joel W5ZN

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 17, 2018, at 7:28 AM, <n4is@n4is.com> <n4is@n4is.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Joel
> 
> I have the same impression as Bill mentioned. 160m paper QSL requires a card
> checker, however LOTW confirmation does not have the same process, no QSO or
> QSL check at all. We've seen 160m " QSO's"  on Club Log  and subsequent
> confirmation on LOTW on plain day light.
> 
> 73's
> JC
> N4IS
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Topband <topband-bounces@contesting.com> On Behalf Of w5zn@w5zn.org
> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2018 8:12 AM
> To: topband <topband@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
> 
> Folks - I'm not exactly understanding the LoTW comments on this thread. 
> If it is referring to the LoTW screen shot totals listed by OK1RD on his
> website then that is the combined totals in his DXCC record, not the totals
> confirmed solely via LoTW so a "hack" has not necessarily occurred.
> 
> Regardless, there is convincing evidence some bogus QSL cards were reviewed
> and accepted by a DXCC card checker somewhere and then entered into his DXCC
> record!
> 
> 73 Joel W5ZN
> 
> On 2018-11-17 05:29, Bill Tippett wrote:
>>>> Doesn't say much for the DXCC checking process either.  73 Clive 
>>>> GM3POI
>> 
>> 
>> Guys this was probably done by OK1RD to embarrass ARRL/DXCC, in 
>> retaliation
>> 
>> for ARRL (correctly) removing his bogus listing over 10 years ago.  He
>> 
>> probably found a way to hack LOTW and no human monitored the result.  
>> I'm
>> 
>> sure they will correct the listing but it does raise some serious 
>> issues
>> 
>> about the security of their system.
>> 
>> 
>> 73,  Bill  W4ZV
>> _________________
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband 
>> Reflector
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
> 

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>