Anyone who doesn't want WWV and its sister stations to close down needs to
SPEAK UP NOW. Sometimes bureaucrats and politicians faced with demands to
shrink their budgets propose things for elimination precisely because they know
there's a constituency that will complain loudly and then the closure won't
happen (like when a city official proposes to close a firehouse). Whether
that's the case here or not, we need to show that there is a constituency for
WWV and we do care. Otherwise, how will they know and what will they assume?
Uphill struggle? Perhaps. But so is working 200 countries on topband from a
suburban lot, and lots of people on this list are up for that.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 19, 2018, at 21:23, <k3ky@radioprism.com> <k3ky@radioprism.com> wrote:
>
> Oooh- here's the deal with that- Although I totally agree with the
> intent of the petition, and would otherwise add my name to it,
> I have several problems with this:
>
> Please note, I DO NOT intend to stir up any political discussion
> here!
>
> (1.) 100,000 valid entries is indeed a massively uphill battle
> for an amateur fraternity numbering only around 700,000 or so for
> the entire US. What with rampant apathy and deep divisions in the
> country, I believe this may not be an attainable goal. Too bad.
> I would very much miss WWV and WWVH. I think they may well get
> the axe anyway. Too many promises have been made to the un-needy/
> undeserving... and the country is hemorrhaging money anyway.
>
> (2.) I have always felt *very* exposed in terms of privacy. Up
> to now I have studiously avoided all lemming-like enterprises
> such as Facebook, Google, Pay Pal, Twitter, et al... OK call me a
> Luddite. I prefer, ahem, 'slow adopter'. And I am sooooooo glad
> today I'm not being exploited very much by such firms. Also I do
> anonomized searches (Startpage, DuckDuckGo, etc.) I have always
> been reluctant to give up any personal information to anyone
> unless absolutely necessary, i.e. for Social Security etc.
> How much less likely am I to want to get on a White House list
> or any other similar thing considering *today's* chilling,
> poisoned environment? Sorry, guys, I'll sit this one out.
>
> (3.) Even in the unlikely event the 100,000 milestone is
> actually achieved, what guarantee is there it wouldn't just fall
> on deaf ears? I strongly suspect the Executive Branch agenda
> isn't much congruent with the actual needs and wants of the
> majority- and that seems to be the case most of the time
> regardless of which party is in ascendancy...
>
> 73, David K3KY
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|