Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Question about KH1 to EU QSO possibilities with respect to

To: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>, topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Question about KH1 to EU QSO possibilities with respect to auroral oval
From: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 18:50:59 -0700
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Agree. At my QTH 47.6 N (Seattle) the oval is almost always in the way to EU so long path on 80 is more reliable winter months if the EU's hang around for the west coast sunrise. So far EU on 160 has been very difficult. Not complaining since I was one of the lucky 120 that worked KH1 on TB ft8.

Last night I tried TB FT8 and had decent pskreporter S/N reports to all of east coast at 0400Z but nobody there was on the air. So even with summer being "dead" on TB that may not always be true. No EU reports 'tho, but not many reporting stations either.

Grant KZ1W

On 7/14/2018 9:49 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:
There was a lot of discussion about the Baker Is. Dxpedition
implying that the main impediment as to where they could work
was mutual darkness.  Here in W6, we have many hours of mutual
darkness with EU, yet we rarely hear EU on 160 or even 80 meters.
(Except 80 meter long path during our morning).
The auroral oval hypothesis seems to be proven by the fact that
we can still work the Azores and northern Africa, and maybe
just barely southern Portugal, but nothing farther north.
Except for occasional exceptional propagation, during which
EU becomes a chip shot for the night.

Why should anyone expect to have KH1 to EU propagation directly
over the north pole even in the presence of mutual darkness,
except as a rare fluke?

73
Rick N6RK
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>