Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Baker Island DXpedition condx

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Baker Island DXpedition condx
From: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 11:26:05 -0700
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
According to the latest Clublog DX Report, 20-meters is still the money band; 34% of all reported contacts made during the last 7 days were on 20.  Of those, 41% were DX contacts.  Second was 40-meters.  Thirty meters was actually fourth, behind 6-meters.

Wes  N7WS


On 6/15/2018 11:02 AM, Bryon Paul Veal NØAH wrote:
I have no doubt they will be successful on the lowbands with what should hopefully be an ambient free RF 
zone- Despite the short windows, and my guess 30M will be their best band, if you want to call that a 
lowband. I do- The greyline characteristics in crap conditions are well proven.   I only say this because I 
am comparing my experience on Lord Howe in April of 1998 VK9LZ one man DX’pedition. Condx sucked- 
With K=8, A up to 70+, and SF never broke 70.  I worked 30M across every greyline I had during my darkness- 
40 was ok, 80 was poor, and I didn’t have a topband antenna. I only had daytime propagation on 17 
and 20 meters North to JA, and a number of PAC islands, except one day 17M opened briefly to stateside.  
30M was over 50% of my 2,432 QSO’s made in a week operating around 18-20 hours a day/night in a hut. 
Used a Cushcraft AP8A and no amp.  I am always surprised what 30m can do and I hope we see some fast rates 
on CW excluding the FT8 mess. Won’t be an ATNO for me, but will be interesting to see the topband 
results- It will certainly contribute to the better understanding TopBand propagation. I get FT-8, I really 
do- but just another means of taking away time from the pure essence of CW from 160M.



73  Paul  N0AH




_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>