To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: low inv-vee |
From: | K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net> |
Date: | Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:11:36 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
If you run a NEC analysis it will show that a 160 dipole at a half
wavelength height will blow away any vertical when the signal is
broadside to the dipole. The people that have tried this say it aint
so. At least some of the reasons are that NEC knows nothing about 160
propagation and it knows nothing about the effect of Earth's electron
gyrofrequency. That varies a lot depending on where you are located on
this earth. Analysis is nice and easy but you have to include everything
for it to simulate the real world, and the real world on 160 is very
complicated.
Jerry, K4SAV On 3/28/2018 9:50 PM, Mark K3MSB wrote: I don't think so. In my Electromagnetic Fields and Waves class in EE school (way back when dinosaurs just stopped roaming the earth and Constellations still graced the skies...) the prof derived the equation for a received signal. The polarization terms disappeared after the first ionospheric bounce. 73 Mark K3MSB On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, 9:03 PM Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org> wrote:Interesting. Some say that on 160 vertical polarization rules, while on 80, horizontal polarization rules (or at least *often* rules). Of course polarization and angle of arrival are two different things... -Steve K8LX On 03/28/18 17:23 PM, Roger Kennedy wrote:Well I've said it before and I'll doubtless say it again . . . In my experience, most DX propagation on 160m ISN'T low angle (unlike80mwhen it nearly always IS.) For the past 45 years, at several different QTHs I've always used a horizontal co-ax fed halfwave dipole, only 50ft high . . . I'm sure most people would agree I put a respectable DX signal. I've regularly workedallover the world on Top band, and I've never had trouble getting through pile-ups to work Dx-peditions. Plus a dipole at 40 feet will never really be an inverted vee ! (just a horizontal antenna with drooping ends) - You'd have to have the centre at least 100ft high for it to be an inverted vee. Roger G3YRO_________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband_________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Wednesday 160m DX Activity Night, Brian Pease |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Wednesday 160m DX Activity Night, daraymond |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: low inv-vee, Mark K3MSB |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: low inv-vee, Guy Olinger K2AV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |