Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: low band propagation at solar min

To: "topband@contesting.com topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: low band propagation at solar min
From: Yuri Blanarovich <k3bu@optimum.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 23:06:49 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
There appear to be different propagation patterns during various sunspot cycles.

From my article in CQ Magazine June 1980:
http://www.k3bu.us/propagation.htm


It is known that with increased sunspot activity the thickness of the atmosphere increases. (This caused Skylab to come down prematurely). This also increases the height of the propagating layers and therefore increases the height and length of the "arches", it allows us to span longer distances and extends propagation later into the night.

We have been told that during peaks of solar activity the lower frequency bands are very poor, mainly because of attenuation of the D layer of the ionosphere. On the contrary, the propagation on the low bands has been better than what we experienced during the sunspot minima. The 40m. band has longer openings to remote areas of the world. Eighty meters is the same; we are hearing Europeans around 6 p.m. local time. During the 160m. CQ Contest I was hearing G stations for about 8 hours during the night. It appears again that the refracting layers are higher, allowing us to work longer distances with stronger signal levels.

It appears then that with higher sunspot activity, the average height of the media increases, refraction of higher frequencies improves, allowing us to work further and increase the number of useful frequencies for communication. 
<

Area under sunspot cycle count curve would be representative of the amount of Sun's energy emission over the cycle. Cycles with high activity would have "fatter" curve, representing more intense energy hitting the Earth, atmosphere and ionosphere heights increase, (atmosphere gases expand) and propagation layers increase height. The result is that sunspot minima between "fat" more intense cycles are different, they are shorter and with layers at higher altitudes. Minima between or after low cycles are longer and layers are at lower heights, changing propagation paths, shorter openings.

There is also hysteresis - flywheel effect where the effects are shifted, delayed as we see in shift in Earth temperatures (coldest days are not the shortest days, but shifted.)

To summarize, it appears that best top band propagation happens during sunspot minima at high sunspot activity cycles. Other variables, layers, absorption, Earth angles make top band propagation so unpredictable, but there is a pattern to it. "You gotta be there when it happens!"

This has effect on weather patterns too, where low sunspot cycles cause atmosphere (gas) to shrink, becomes more dense and weather patterns change, hurricanes, tornadoes etc. Global whatever, not our SUVs. I hope K9LA gives me credit for this explanation and record, unlike denying my pointing out high angle propagation on top band.

73
Yuri Blanarovich, VE3BMV, K3BU.us
topbanding since 1958


 
 On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 07:21 PM, John Kaufmann wrote:
 
 > (Note: disregard my earlier incomplete post)

Carl K9LA: " But in my opinion (and in the opinion of others) the deep and long solar minimum between Cycles 23 and 24 (2006-2010) didn't live up to this axiom compared to the not-so-deep and not-so-long solar minimum between Cycles 22 and 23 (1995-1997). It suggests that all solar minimums aren't the
same."

I will continue the comparison by saying that the solar minimum in the
mid-1980's topped that of the following two decades in terms of low band propagation. Top Band activity in the 1980's was nothing like it is today, but despite that I observed many openings into Europe that sounded like a 20m opening. Propagation to mid-eastern and central Asia occurred pretty regularly. I remember hearing 9M2AX on long path much louder than most of the Europeans he was working. JA's were almost a daily occurrence into W1
during January of 1987.
I assumed that this was normal propagation for 160 but I have never observed anything consistently as good as it was in the 1980's. Anyone else found this to be true? What was different about the solar minimum in that decade?

73, John W1FV



_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>