Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: strange propagation

To: n1rj@roadrunner.com, topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation
From: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Louis Parascondola <gudguyham@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:34:16 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Roger, I have forwarded this issue to the owner of RHR and waiting for his 
reply.  Lou



-----Original Message-----
From: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
To: topband <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 5:35 am
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation

I heard from a friend, who talked to his uncle who stated that he heard on a 
20m net, that hamsare allowed to disregard any FCC rule that they find 
inconvenient.73, RogerOn 1/15/2016 4:18 AM, Ed Sawyer wrote:> Thankfully, this 
is not the case.  The FCC rules are quite clear on this issue.  From Section 
107 of Part 97 FCC rules:>>>> “(a) The station licensee is responsible for the 
proper operation of the station in accordance with the FCC Rules. When the 
control operator is a different amateur operator than the station licensee, 
both persons are equally responsible for proper operation of the station.>> (b) 
The station licensee must designate the station control operator. The FCC will 
presume that the station licensee is also the control operator, unless 
documentation to the contrary is in the station records.>> (c) The station 
licensee must make the station and the station records available for inspection 
upon request by an FCC representative.>> N1UR>>>_________________Topband 
Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>