Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: QRP

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: QRP
From: K4OWR <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 09:34:21 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
:::: I have a question....that will likely cause me grief; What exactly is the point of operating such a difficult band, full of all sorts of noise, relatively awful propagation, requiring gigantic antennas, then using the low power? Is it because using high power makes it so easy, because it really doesn't.


On 12/15/2015 9:14 AM, Tom W8JI wrote:
I have been puzzled with this question for a long time...
Given the progress on antenna and Rx-capabilities (over the years) and say
typical transceiver output power (100W),
how come it has become so rare to witness (experience) low power to low power
QSO's (over the USA to EU path)
during major topband contests (winter time on both continents) ?

What has happened to the topband conditions the last couple of decades?
IMO it is hard to believe this is due only to environmental noise increases?!


The largest problem is QRM. Mostly from intentional transmitters and also from hundreds of unintended transmitters that cause noise.

In the USA during contests, stations are stacked every few hundred Hz.
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>