| To: | topband List <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: 2 wl loop, worth the effort? |
| From: | Gary and Kathleen Pearse <pearse@gci.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:05:01 -0900 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Try putting a closed reflector wire under a 1 WL horizontal loop. Lay it on the ground or bury. Use insulated wire and size per typical loops…~+5% at design frequency. Experiment by listening to weak signals while opening and closing the ends of the reflector. At our latitude (64N) loops (and Inv-L’s) work well if a full size vert is unavailable. Some have suggested it’s due to our tilted Ionosphere. That’s been my experience on 40-160. 73, Gary NL7Y _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 2 wl loop, worth the effort?, Mike Waters |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 2 wl loop, worth the effort?, James Rodenkirch |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 2 wl loop, worth the effort?, Tom W8JI |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 2 wl loop, worth the effort?, Don Kirk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |