To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: G5RV Conversion For 160M Use |
From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
Date: | Sun, 07 Jun 2015 17:14:40 -0700 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On Sun,6/7/2015 10:53 AM, Keith Jillings (G3OIT) wrote: If it's a "double size", won't it tune on 160 as-is? I have a standard G5RV that works well on all bands 80 - 10. "Tuning" and 'working well" are two very different things. Jim's antenna at 50-60 ft is too low to be very effective on 160M. When I first moved here, I had a 160 dipole at about 125 ft, and it was "low." My first tee vertical, roughly 60 ft with about 40 radials, beat it 90% of the time, and often by a lot. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: WD-1A wire, Dave Blaschke, w5un |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Binocular Cores, Martin Kratoska |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: G5RV Conversion For 160M Use, Keith Jillings (G3OIT) |
Next by Thread: | Topband: G5RV Conversion, Jim Murray via Topband |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |