Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Binocular Cores

To: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>, Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Binocular Cores
From: Roger Parsons via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:46:37 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Thanks Tom
I guess I really should have done that in the first place. They do appear to be 
the same mix as R ~ X at around 2 MHz in each case. I tested a few of each type 
and the variations in impedance were quite substantial, but didn't appear to be 
correlated to the DC ohmeter check. 

I guess the moral of the story is not to measure a parameter that the 
manufacturer doesn't specify!

73 RogerVE3ZI
     From: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
 To: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>; Topband <topband@contesting.com> 
 Sent: Monday, 1 June 2015, 11:31
 Subject: Re: Topband: Binocular Cores
   
You really need to do a single loop through the core windows and measure the 
impedance with some sort of analyzer. Even an MFJ259B with a short 
connection to the jack will work well for this.

If the resistance equals the reactance down somewhere around 2 MHz, it is 73 
material.

If R=X someplace much higher, you can be sure it is a different mix. The Q=1 
frequency, where R=X or where loss tangent crosses reactance, tells you the 
material better than anything else you can do.

That is how I quickly sort unknown cores.

73 Tom




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger Parsons via Topband" <topband@contesting.com>
To: "Topband" <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 10:13 AM
Subject: Topband: Binocular Cores


>I have some binocular cores which I know are FairRite mix 73. I have others 
>which I thought were also mix 73. However, the first ones measure about 50k 
>Ohms with ohmeter prods onto their surface, whereas the others only measure 
>about 1k Ohm. I don't believe that that is a defined parameter, and am 
>aware that the test is not very scientific, but I am surprised to see such 
>a difference. Thoughts?
> 73 RogerVE3ZI
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4800 / Virus Database: 4311/9916 - Release Date: 06/01/15
> 



   
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>