Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Anyone using WSPR or WSPR-X?

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Anyone using WSPR or WSPR-X?
From: Eric NO3M <no3m@no3m.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:30:00 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
-33 is the lowest I've personally decoded, been decoded, and have seen between others. Currently running WSPR4 in Linux with a Microham MK2R+ (built in USB soundcard).

73 Eric NO3M / WG2XJM

On 09/03/2014 01:41 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On Wed,9/3/2014 2:39 AM, Mike Waters wrote:
Yesterday I decoded a Chinese station on 30m WSPR, at a level of -28. From
http://wsprnet.org/drupal/wsprnet/spots:
2014-09-02 21:34  BZ1UIF  10.140268  -28  0  ND81  5  W0BTU EM37  17566
  158

According to something you said in your interface PDF, the -28 seems to
indicate that I already have a decent sound card (among other things.) What
do you think?

Probably yes, but my testing was JT65, where -22 to -23 is pretty much the lower limit at which signals can be decoded. WSPR uses a more powerful noise reduction protocol that can get deeper into the noise floor. Check the WSPR doc for what that limit is.

73, Jim K9YC
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>