Much of the discussion of todays transceivers is like comparing apples
to apples. My situation did not require a big box status symbol with
over a hundred button features. My requirements were standard
communications interface ala serial, USB or Ethernet control with a
decent receiver. Sub menus via computer screen.
My ten year remote project started before K3 days and most
manufacturers could not satisfy the above requirement without silly
interface boxes. Many of those who had the specific features had lack
luster firmware and software control. My interest in remote operation
due to big city life and restrictions fueled my multiscreen computer
control and I ended up with a Kenwood TS480 with the narrow 270 Hz cw
filter option.
DXing is a casual operation for me and separate simple SDR with loop is
used for basic split frequency operation. Proper adjustment of the
attenuator, RF gain and ALC is the key to this radio specific
performance. Dual receive diversity is through a simple audio mixer and
really is seldom used.
My option is not for everyone. However, with the typical longtime ham
station for seasoned low bander or contester in the price range of a
couple of Harleys or nice BMW it is not out of sight.
The bottom line. A simple transceiver with quiet location and good
antenna works for me. If you can't hear them you can't work them no
matter what you spend.
73,
Bob W7RH
http://w7rh.net
--
W7RH DM35OS
Some people regard private enterprise as a predatory tiger to be shot. Others
look on it as a cow they can milk. Not enough people see it as a healthy horse,
pulling a sturdy wagon.
Winston Churchill
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|