Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 50 ohm direct burial coax cable

To: <donovanf@starpower.net>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 50 ohm direct burial coax cable
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:37:03 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
For monoband use, use an asynchronous transformer to go to 50 Ohms if you or the equipment is that fussy.
http://www.k1ttt.net/technote/matching.html

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- From: <donovanf@starpower.net>
To: <topband@contesting.com>
Cc: <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: 50 ohm direct burial coax cable


You can easily make the 75 ohm coax essentially "invisible" in a monoband
application by using some RG-11 to extend the total length of the 75
ohm feedline to any multiple of 1/2 wavelength.

73
Frank
W3LPL

----- Original Message -----

From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 8:33:35 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: 50 ohm direct burial coax cable

On 6/13/2014 12:17 PM, Donald Chester wrote:
I think you're being overly picky. The 75-ohm cable would be at worst a 1.5:1 mismatch. Probably a fraction of a dB loss at most, particularly with foam type hard line. If you have a source of good, low-loss 75-ohm coax that will safely handle the power you intend to run, and which will hold up for an extended period under direct burial, use it.

Yes. Assuming a suitable matching network at the transmitter, worst case
excess loss due to a 1.5:1 mismatch is 0.18 dB, no matter how long the
line. Curves showing this have been in every edition of the ARRL
Handbook since I've been a ham (59 years).

73, Jim K9YC
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>