Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Shunt feeding the Skyneedle - new developments

To: "Carl Braun" <Carl.Braun@lairdtech.com>, "'160'" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Shunt feeding the Skyneedle - new developments
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:07:08 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I was pretty satisfied with this scenario so I mounted my variable cap on a 3/4" thick piece of Plexiglas to the backplane via Teflon bolts inside the steel enclosure. When I did this I saw my analyzer jump to 45 -j11 ohms. No matter how much tweaking was done the lowest "X" on the analyzer was 11. Figuring I could live with that after making 24 contacts this morning I decided to move ahead with my gamma cage. When I completed the cage per the info above I left my analyzer set on the previous frequency setting of 1825 and saw the resistance jump and the X go out of site. Adjusting my variable cap (from approx 140 pf to 420 pf) rewarded me with a 42 + j0 reading.

Inside the shack on the 1000D and the BIRD I see 1.1:1 Vswr at 1.800 MHz, FLAT 1.0:1 from 1.810 to 1.860 and 1.5:1 at 1.895 MHz.>>>

I would expect you to have that bandwidth. It does NOT indicate loss.

Your shunt system now has an operating Q of around 4, because you now have 200 ohms of series C.

With a thick radiator and a large yagi on top, and so much capacitance, you are exactly on target.

While I don't fully trust the FT1000 meter, no matter what, never automatically assume modest bandwidth like you have indicates loss. It doesn't. There are a whole lot of things that go into bandwidth beside loss!

73 Tom
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>