Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Digital mode spurious issues

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Digital mode spurious issues
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 22:55:46 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Thanks everyone for the suggestions. I'm going to have to install some software to identify some of the signals.


I would think that IMD products in a high-level PA that is over-driven
beyond good linearity  limits could add some junk in the "undesired
sideband"? FWIW


IMD **requires** two or more signals at once, and does not appear anything like sideband leakage. This was a single shifting tone, and the lower frequency signal went the opposite way but the same amount as the main signal with shifts. That is classic for inadequate sideband suppression.

There are multiple problems with using SSB to transmit audio tones and "thinking" it is a pure digi mode.

1.) things like this do not show on almost all digi waterfalls because they are out of passband of the other fellows receiver.

2.) SSB carrier, noise, and opposite sideband suppression is limited by the radio quality

3.) output purity is also limited by audio input purity, which includes audio line issues

4.) most digi operators do not have the low noise antennas most DXers have, and cannot hear some fairly strong signals. They are often on digimodes because of that!

5.) radios have terrible SSB transmitter performance compared to even fair receivers, so the transmitters often set the adjacent channel interference levels

Placing digimodes near weak signal areas is not very wise frequency planning, but there is nothing anyone can do about it.
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>