To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, |
From: | "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net> |
Reply-to: | Richard Fry <rfry@adams.net> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:19:28 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
BC stations tried 5/8 wavelength antennas to maximize their groundwave coverage. Unfortunately, the high angle lobe produced a skywave that caused severe interference fading at night out in their desired coverage area. Most 50 kW, 24/7, omnidirectional MW broadcast stations such as WJR, KMOX etc use a radiator height close to 195 degrees, which produces almost as much groundwave field as a 5/8-wave, but without the high-angle lobe centered at about 60 degrees elevation. It was this high-angle lobe that produced self-interference when the skywave radiation from it arrived out of phase with the groundwave, at the edges of the groundwave coverage area. RF _________________ Topband Reflector |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, Charlie Cunningham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??, Niko Cimbur |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??,, Richard Fry |
Next by Thread: | Topband: Interesting discovery, Yuri Blanarovich |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |