Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??,

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??,
From: "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net>
Reply-to: Richard Fry <rfry@adams.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:53:28 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
We were shocked to find that the existing 1/4 wl performed better than the much taller Vertical.

The link below compares the elevation patterns of monopoles ranging from a 1/4-wave to 5/8-wave in height. These are the patterns "launched" by these monopoles as they exist a few wavelengths from their base.

It can be seen that the taller monopoles have greater fields in and near the horizontal plane, but their fields at higher angles are not as great as from the shorter monopoles.

For some propagation conditions and skip distances, shorter monopoles might produce higher skywave fields, for a given applied power.

But taller monopoles (up to 5/8-wave) always produce greater groundwave and low-angle fields than shorter monopoles, for a given applied power.

http://s20.postimg.org/olcquv94d/Monopole_Elev_Patterns.gif

RF
_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>