Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Double L antenna as an alternative for the radial-challenged?

To: "'topband@contesting.com'" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: Double L antenna as an alternative for the radial-challenged?
From: Andreas Hofmann <Andreas.Hofmann@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:24:25 +0000
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Hi,

I am looking into what it would take to put a decent 160m antenna up.  I got 
many large trees, but also rather thick woods, and the radials are always 
something that I do not enjoy much. Also, I cannot see myself to do 16 radials. 
4 elevated radials may be tough as well.  Terrain is just not as easy to get 
around.

Now, I am looking at options that do not require radials and still have a 
decent radiation angle for DX.  I am looking at this antenna 
http://www.yccc.org/Articles/double_l.htm, the double L antenna.  Has anyone 
experience with it?  What is the pattern of it and can it be compared to a 
quarter wave vertical?  I would assume since it somehow resembles a vertical 
dipole and therefore does not require any radials, that its efficiency should 
be much better than a quarter wave vertical with less than adequate number of 
radials...  Are my assumptions correct, and are there any other gotchas?

Thanks and cu soon on topband
Andy,
KU7T
_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>