Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Are stacked verticals feasible?

To: Carl <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>, "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Are stacked verticals feasible?
From: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 02:30:00 +0000
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Isn't this a "Vertical dipole"? Two quarter wave radiating elements? And tower 
behind it will be some kind of reflector/director depending on height. The 
radials seem unimportant if thought of this way.

Tim N3QE
________________________________________
From: Topband [topband-bounces@contesting.com] on behalf of Carl 
[km1h@jeremy.mv.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 9:17 AM
To: topband
Subject: Topband: Are stacked verticals feasible?

Assuming that sufficient tower height was available, guy wires are insulated
or broken up into short non-resonant sections. Tower face is 12 or 18".

Start at 1/4 wave up with a 1/4 wave ground plane with radials sloping at
about 45 degrees. The vertical wire is 6-12' away from the tower face.

Then a 1/4 wave (or 1/8) up install a duplicate.

What does EZNEC say about this?

With the different spacings?

Effect of starting lower and how low before there are ground related
problems?

Phasing with coax or a LC network?

Switching in a delay line to tilt the lobe up a bit?

Curiosity got the cat!

Carl
KM1H




_________________
Topband Reflector
_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>