Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity
From: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>
Reply-to: midnight18@cox.net
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 17:40:06 -0700
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I'm intrigued by the number of comments on this thread. I'll offer my two cents as if there are a few who might concur.

Size matters only in the length and density of the ground plane elements. Electrical height of 160 mono poles in the range of 25 degree to 60 degree offer excellent performance when properly matched over a ground plane of 60 or more radials of .3 wavelength. Spending time and effort for massive steel mono poles or high supports for horizontal antennas for top band are a waste of time and effort with considerable cost. You can not compare 160m to most of the HF bands. Propagation here is in it's own world and continuously changing. We don't care about sky wave cancellation...

Yes, you want a low angle of radiation but you also want sky wave propagation as well. Go a shorter vertical monopole and get the most of both worlds. You will also have a great antenna to achieve the goals in a Ham Radio application.

I say this with 7 years experience using low power with my 5 element 160m array using 40ft high top loaded by sloping wire verticals. K7CA, K7NJ, W7TVF, NK7C and N7JW use verticals of 60 degrees or less as the antenna components. I say this with caveat, the antenna sighting and location is important. Smooth, flat terrain with no large obstructions in the near field is required.

--

Bob Kile, W7RH
DM35OS
--------------
“There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading.
The few who learn by observation.
The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.”
Will Rogers

_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>