Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: FCP model

To: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: FCP model
From: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:43:09 -0600
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
For a short vertical I prefer ground radials over an elevated counterpoise
because the counterpoise height reduces the monopole length.

Dave WX7G
On Aug 1, 2012 9:32 AM, "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com> wrote:

> > I think a more relevant question should be "is there a better or simpler
> > elavated radial arrangement that can fit into the 66 foot linear space
> > that will radiate more effectively than the FCP design"? I'd be willing
> to
> > extend that distance to 100 feet since many surburban lots can support a
> > 100 foot run.
> >
> > Most people cannot erect elevated 2 or 4 quarter wavelength full length
> > radials.
>
> >From what I have seen, within limits of what we could really notice, there
> are dozens of ways to accomplish the same thing. All have about the same
> result. There is no universal solution that makes every 50 foot backyard
> look the same, let alone look like 50 acres of flat rich soil.
>
> The key is always more about not doing something wrong, and doing what fits
> and lasts.
>
> Whoever said 2-4 elevated radials always works? Many times fifteen or
> twenty
> 50-foot radials on the ground are the same or better.
>
> 73 Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>