Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Connector installation on flooded cable

To: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Connector installation on flooded cable
From: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:19:37 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Bingo.  Any difference in the GE stuff and the silicon grease found in auto
stores?

73, Guy.

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com> wrote:

> > MEK), mostly to get a good visual on the strands. I apply
> > Noalox (contact grease) to restore water resistance.
>
> Years and years ago, I headed enginering for a company that owned dozens of
> cable and MATV systems. Because of FCC regulations and proximity of some
> systems to airport flight paths, we tested a variety of things to reduce
> connector problems.
>
> We very quickly abandoned things like noalox and settled on either 100%
> pure
> GE silicon dielectric compound, or a Teflon based dielectric compound
> manufactured by a company in Lorain Ohio (or some city close to Lorain). We
> actually found an increase in connection problems with things like Noalox.
>
> Our policy evolved into dabbing the male connector inside with dielectric
> compound, and lightly smearing the female threads. We used the Teflon paste
> only on trunk lines.
>
> Noalox caused center pin connection problems on our trunk and drop cables,
> turning copper black. We had to replace many connectors that had Noalox
> contacting the copper. I think it was some sort of zinc-copper reaction,
> but
> that was years ago.
>
> 73 Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>