On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 18:46 -0400, ZR wrote:
> Yeah, I meant the current regulator. Shipboard power in the 30's wasnt
> exactly stable.
>
> A simple converter to take 160 and 80 down to the RAK's best tuning ratio
> band would be an interesting experiment.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
Hi Carl,
I gathered that from some of the RAL/RAL items I have read regarding
less than the best power. When you mentioned the regulator I was a
little confused so I looked again. Some of the articles I read called
the current regulator a "ballast" tube.
I have fooled around with a "converter" ahead of the RAK. It wasn't
serious, just some haywired, temporary, experiment stuff. But it worked.
One of these days I will build something a little sturdier and more
permanent. Can you spell Q5er?
73,
Bill KU8H
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
|