| To: | "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: 160M JT65HF, etc.... |
| From: | n0ah.ham Paul Veal <bryonveal@msn.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Jan 2012 15:08:14 -0700 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I think I speak for many when the real issue is adjacent digital QRM at or near
the edge of 1.835MHz. There is much less CW from 1.840MHz-1.850Mhz. If antenna
tuning issues are the main problem, why not just move up outside the band edge
of 1.840Mhz??
I have a real problem with digital operators who ignore our presence near or
around 1.838MHz and just blindly transmit where stations are listening. I
really appreciate the nature of a lot of the informative posts from JT65
operators on this matter, but are we just not discussing moving up 3 KHz from
1.838Mhz?
73
paul N0AH
DM79nn
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Fwd: Re: More Inv-L matching issues.... BIGGER ISSUE, Paul Dulaff |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 160 meters, Andy Blank |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160M JT65HF, Steven Raas |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160M JT65HF, etc...., Joe Subich, W4TV |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |