Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Radials - a point to ponder

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: Radials - a point to ponder
From: "Michael G. Carper" <mike@wa9pie.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:53:57 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
When I sent out a recent email about the 160m inverted-L I was finishing
with four ¼ wavelength (130?) radials, I got a few responses back indicating
that I should cut them in half and double them.

 

So I got out ON4UN?s book to look at the guidance there.

 

·         Chart 9-18 on p. 9-12 indicate that the radial lengths should be
10m, 40m, and 80m (basically, that?s 32?, 130?, and 260? w/rounding).
There?s no mention of 20m (65?) radials in these models.

·         Table 9.3 on p 9-14 indicate that for four radials, the optimum
length is 0.10 wavelength (about 51?) and 0.15 wavelength (about 76?) for
twelve radials.

·         Then again, the text in section 2.1.3 on p 9-14 says ?on 160
meters, you should use 20-meter (65?) radials if you are only using a few
(up to four).

 

Overall, I?m considering going with the design suggestions in table 9-3 for
twelve radials (30-degrees apart) that are 76.7? long (0.15 wavelength for
1.83 Mhz).

 

Any opinions about that?

 

Mike, WA9PIE

 

_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Topband: Radials - a point to ponder, Michael G. Carper <=