On 8/24/2011 3:59 AM, Pete Smith wrote:
> Do you have the capability to measure their response? If they claim
> they are essentially flat down to 5 MHz, and they don't fall off a
> cliff below that, they might be a useful alternative to homebrewing,
> or certainly to the $30 Mini-Circuits splitter.
I have some measurement capability, but with many other things on my
plate, hesitate to repeat work that a very capable guy like Jack has
already done. Although I haven't seen his data, I would certainly trust
it, and would expect it to show degraded response and/or isolation
outside the design range of the product involved, and for lower quality
el-cheapo consumer products. One of the key advantages of the
Mini-Circuits splitters is that they typically offer 20-30dB of
isolation between outputs within their design range.
No, I would not expect response to fall off a cliff at the lower
frequency limit in a Mini-Circuit spec, but rather for performance to
gradually decline at lower frequency. There are a few Mini-Circuits
splitters, that for example, should still work on 160M, albeit with
reduced isolation and/or degraded response. I have a 1x4 that I'm using
to split my Beverages to two main K3 RX and one Sub RX, and a 1x2 that
I'm using to split a 6M preamp to main RX and Sub RX. While I could
split the preamp with a Tee, the splitter provides a lot of isolation,
which has nearly eliminated the strong birdies I used to hear with both
RX running when I used a Tee to split the preamp. I found all of my
splitters at hamfests for a few bucks.
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
|