| To: | Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days |
| From: | Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net> |
| Reply-to: | herbs@vitelcom.net |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:41:49 -0400 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Julius Fazekas wrote: > > Wonder how many worked WAS during this year's ARRL160, and it would have been > a completely different game had it occurred this past weekend. > Julius, WAS on 160 is much easier today even for DX. I had done it before in 29 hours but during this years ARRL 160 Contest I dropped that to under 9 hours. Idaho rather than KH6 or KL7 was the most elusive but it came though as the last needed.. Herb, KV4FZ _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days, k3bu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: Europe to California QSO's on SSB last night, Richard (Rick) Karlquist |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days, alan eshleman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days, Milt, N5IA |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |