Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: insulated vs:bare radial wires

To: topband@contesting.com, W8AV@aol.com
Subject: Re: Topband: insulated vs:bare radial wires
From: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 10:13:05 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Hi Goose,

Think this holds true if you lay down a hundred or more, but is not the case if 
you install fewer based on more recent research...

30000 feet will be loads of fun to lay hihi

73 & GL in ARRL160!
Julius

Julius Fazekas
N2WN

Tennessee Contest Group
http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.html
http://groups.google.com/group/tcg1?hl=en

Tennessee QSO Party
http://www.tnqp.org/

Elecraft K2/100 #4455
Elecraft K3/100 #366
Elecraft K3/100 #1875


> Just make them as long as you can (not to
> exceed 0.4  wavelengths) 
> and you are done.  The 0.4 wavelength number comes
> from  research done many 
> years ago and published in the Proceedings of the
> IRE.   It shows that the 
> amount of radiation efficiency that you gain by going
> longer  than 0.4 
> wavelengths is not worth the trouble.


_______________________________________________
160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>