------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:34:22 -0700
From: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Trees And RF
To: Bruce <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Cc: Topband@contesting.com
Message-ID:
<bd146ab90911041834n13f3603bq7f965914f1db82a5@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
AntenneX had an article a few years ago on a tree antenna.
Dave WX7G
So did QST back in the late 50's or early 60's. Darned if I can find it
though. It was taken from a US Army Signal Corps study.
73 Craig
PS I reiterate my earlier comment: at HF, Trees are not worth losing sleep
over. Working the TX3 is OTOH.
Craig Clark K1QX
Radioware
PO Box 209
Rindge NH 03461
603 899 6957
NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS JCCLARK@RADIUSNORTH.NET
_______________________________________________
160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M
|