| To: | "'G4GED Dave'" <radiodave.g4ged@tiscali.co.uk>, <topband@contesting.com>, <dx-qsl@mailman.qth.net>, <g4puq@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: [Dx-qsl] Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs |
| From: | "Craig D. Smith" <craig@powersmith.net> |
| Reply-to: | craig@powersmith.net |
| Date: | Mon, 25 May 2009 13:47:49 -0600 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
OK, my curiosity has gotten the better of me. What is the reason that the
ARRL subjects the 160 meter cards to a different level of scrutiny??
... Craig AC0DS
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: [Dx-qsl] Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs, G4GED Dave |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs, wb6rse1 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: [Dx-qsl] Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs, G4GED Dave |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: [Dx-qsl] Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs, Merv Schweigert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |