| To: | topband <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Beacon Update |
| From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 May 2009 18:00:22 -0400 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kenneth Silverman <kenny.k2kw@gmail.com> > Tree says: "a few stations did report hearing the 1999.5 beacon > better than the lower frequency one." Do people need to adjust for a high-Q (narrow bandwidth) antenna, where the higher frequency will likely be out of bandwidth with attenuated RX ability? Kenny K2KW _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: DX Signal Strenght, Mac @ PY2CW |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: 1.99 and beacons, W7lr |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Beacon update, Merv Schweigert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Beacon Update, Dan Zimmerman N3OX |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |