Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: [Topband] Inverted "L" vs." T"

To: "TopBand List" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: [Topband] Inverted "L" vs." T"
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:00:41 -0700
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:29:22 -0700 (PDT), Rick Karlquist wrote:

>At least at my QTH, a vertical usually
>produces a MUCH stronger (10 to 20 dB) signal than a low (60 ft) dipole,
>except for locals.  Therefore, any radiation produced by the horizontal
>portion of an inverted L is useless most of the time.
>This is because ground reflections will cancel out most of it.  Horizontal
>polarization will work fine...if the horizontal wire is 100's of feet
>high.  But it is low for an inverted L as normally deployed.

Yes. 

73,

Jim K9YC


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>