Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Split frequency working - a different DX perspective

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: Split frequency working - a different DX perspective
From: Steve Ireland <vk6vz@arach.net.au>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:49:59 +0800
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Quoting Jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@verizon.net>:

    split operation for international QSO's
 > on topband is the only sane way to operate.  For me, anything that
 > forces the opposite is ignorant of reality......>


G'day

To offer a slightly different view from Herb, KV4FZ - although if I lived 
where Herb does geographically, I would do the same as him.

In VK6 - geographically very distant from the major 160m operating centres 
of Europe and North America - I rarely use split frequency operation - and 
so do other VK6.

The reason for this is that our signals are usually weak and easily 
missed/accidentally trodden on by stations in the major operating 
centres.  The pile-up on my frequency at least serves to alert stations 
that there is a DX station underneath it - and so I don't get trodden 
on/eaten by alligators.  When I try and work split frequency, it is only a 
matter of minutes before I get trodden on/eaten.

In contrast, Herb is loud in both Europe and North America and thus 
impossible to accidentally tread on.

If I was rare DX rather than common DX (which I am), then I would 
definitely work split, as the angry pileup would quickly tread on anyone 
who trod on me...

Vy 73

Steve, VK6VZ
   


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/226 - Release Date: 10/01/2006


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>