From: "Dave Bowker" <dbowker@mail.sjv.net>
> This flies in the face of the IARU band plans in Regions 1, 2 & 3 as well as
> the
> ARRL's own 160M
> band plan, all of which do allocate a narrow BW segment which is harmonious
> across all regions.
The RM talks about regulation, not voluntary bandplans. I too found it odd that
ARRL felt it unnecessary to partition 160 -- and only 160 -- by bandwidth. See
my previous post re voluntary bandplans. This would be a good starting point
for a comment on ARRL's RM.
73,
Jim, KR1S
http://kr1s.kearman.com/
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|