Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Auroral activity VS cndx on 160

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: Auroral activity VS cndx on 160
From: df2py@t-online.de
Date: 10 Dec 2005 07:38 GMT
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Hi reflectees !
This morning we had auroral activity ( NOAA site ) of levels 8 and 7. Despite 
that fact, W6RJ,N6TR,VE7SV,KA7Y,W7ZQ among others came thru. Whereas the last 
three of the above stations,are really behind the curvature of the auroral oval.
Just proves to me one more time, that almost nothing is usable to predict 
topband cndx. One has just to be there !
73 de wolf 

_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Topband: Auroral activity VS cndx on 160, df2py <=