To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: Auroral activity VS cndx on 160 |
From: | df2py@t-online.de |
Date: | 10 Dec 2005 07:38 GMT |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Hi reflectees ! This morning we had auroral activity ( NOAA site ) of levels 8 and 7. Despite that fact, W6RJ,N6TR,VE7SV,KA7Y,W7ZQ among others came thru. Whereas the last three of the above stations,are really behind the curvature of the auroral oval. Just proves to me one more time, that almost nothing is usable to predict topband cndx. One has just to be there ! 73 de wolf _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: 1820.400, Harold Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 1820.4 Help needed MA and NH, on4ww |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: 1820.400, Harold Smith |
Next by Thread: | Topband: The death of 160m DX contests?, Steve Ireland |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |