| To: | <topband@contesting.com>, "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: High and low angles |
| From: | "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> |
| Reply-to: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:55:53 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
> The other interesting thing is that when high angles are predominant, > Beverages don't work very well because they are low angle antennas. > That is usually my first clue to check the inverted-V, which is often > best for both RX and TX in such conditions. That's exactly the same thing I see here. When my phased RX verticals are useless and my Beverages are nearly useless it is time to use the low dipole (that I no longer have). 73 Tom _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: High and low angles, Tom Rauch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: High and low angles, Michael Tope |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: High and low angles, Ivo Pezer I7/9A3A |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: High and low angles, Earl W Cunningham |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |