Woops and sorry ! Should have checked VE7TCO B4 I made the post: Not only
is my QSO listed bit there are three Q's??? (Somebody having fun, I guess>)
Mike K5UO
To: <topband@contesting.com>
>Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 16:10:46 -0700
>To: Steve Ireland <sire@omen.com.au>, <topband@contesting.com>
>From: Mike-K5UO <bragassa@hal-pc.org>
>Subject: Re: TopBand: An unbearable lack of sleep and 3B7RF
>
>(Snipped a bit)
>A
>>Activities commenced on 40m at around 1815Z (2.30am local). After about 20
>>mins of calling I get a QSO and asked the question, "QSY 160?" The operator
>>obliges with "2000Z." Just to make sure, I decide to doze in the operating
>>chair, with the headphones on.
>>
>Not 160m...but 80m:
>
>On 14 May at 056z I worked the 3B7RF, for a new one on 3507. Many 5's
worked him around this time.
>
>In checking the log search on VE7TCP on 16 May..I see no 80m Q for me. I
checked several other 5's whom I recall worked them: nil/nyet/nada.
>
>Don't tell me I worked a pirate..puh-leze; tell me they were late in
updating their logs for the 14th...or someting like that !
>
>73 de Mike K5UO
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions: topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com
|