Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

No subject

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: No subject
From: bogus@does.not.exist.com ()
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 22:56:08 -0600 (MDT)
smap (V2.0beta)
        id xma004634; Thu, 9 Oct 97 22:56:00 -0600
Message-Id: <3.0.16.19971009225434.492ff698@teal.csn.net>
X-Sender: broz@teal.csn.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (16)
To: topband@contesting.com
From: John Brosnahan <broz@csn.net>
Subject: Re: TopBand: Folded unipoles
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-topband@contesting.com
Precedence: bulk
X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C

An impedance transformer transforms whatever impedance it sees.
Doesn't matter if it is a transmission line transformer, a toroidal
transformer, or a transformer made by folding the monopole into
"half of a folded-dipole".

The impedance that gets transformed includes the ground loss
component.  So the percentage of power lost in ground losses
remains the same when folding the monopole compared to
a normal folded monopole.  You don't get something for nothing.

But there may be other reasons to fold the monopole.  It allows 
for grounding of one side of the monopole--very useful for lightning
protection.  It can broadband the a monopole somewhat by "fattening"
it.  And it can raise the impedance of the antenna system (including
ground losses) to a higher value that may allow different options
for matching circuitry.

But it won't help the efficiency.
John  W0UN


 -
 ---
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions:              topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>