You're wasting your time.
You already found the forest. If you ignore the trees, you'll see it! (hi)
That filter probably has a bad crystal.
Just get a new filter Stan.
73
Rick, DJ0IP
-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Stan
Gammons
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 6:32 AM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Filters
??? The 2.4 Khz filter I have is broken? That's what I think. I
wouldn't think -24 db for the peaks in the passband of the filter would be
"normal" The other filters were all around -15 db peaks in the passband. I
would post the frequency response graphs, but attachments are allowed on
this group.
73
Stan
KM4HQE
On 09/12/2017 11:21 PM, rick@dj0ip.de wrote:
No you don't, it's broken.
73
Rick, DJ0IP
-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Stan
Gammons
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 4:56 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: [TenTec] Filters
I finally got around to doing a sweep of the filters on the PBT board
in my Omni VI using the Midnight SNA. I think I see why the signal
level shown on the S-meter increases when I switch from 2.4 Khz to 1.8
Khz.
The 2.4 Khz filter has like 9 to 10 db more loss than the 1.8 Khz or
500 Hz filters. The extra 1.8 Khz and 500 Hz filters I have all
measured roughly the same. I don't have another 2.4 Khz filter to compare
to.
Guess I need to find another one.
73
Stan
KM4HQE
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec