??? The 2.4 Khz filter I have is broken? That's what I think. I
wouldn't think -24 db for the peaks in the passband of the filter would
be "normal" The other filters were all around -15 db peaks in the
passband. I would post the frequency response graphs, but attachments
are allowed on this group.
73
Stan
KM4HQE
On 09/12/2017 11:21 PM, rick@dj0ip.de wrote:
No you don't, it's broken.
73
Rick, DJ0IP
-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Stan
Gammons
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 4:56 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: [TenTec] Filters
I finally got around to doing a sweep of the filters on the PBT board in my
Omni VI using the Midnight SNA. I think I see why the signal level shown on
the S-meter increases when I switch from 2.4 Khz to 1.8 Khz.
The 2.4 Khz filter has like 9 to 10 db more loss than the 1.8 Khz or 500 Hz
filters. The extra 1.8 Khz and 500 Hz filters I have all measured roughly
the same. I don't have another 2.4 Khz filter to compare to.
Guess I need to find another one.
73
Stan
KM4HQE
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|