TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] INFORMATION ABOUT VERTICAL ANTENNAS

To: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] INFORMATION ABOUT VERTICAL ANTENNAS
From: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 19:40:07 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Jim,

As always, your tutorial(s) is (are) well worth both reading and studying.

How do you ever find the time? Thanks so much for your contribution.

73 de Phil - N8PS





Quoting Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>:

On Sat,1/9/2016 9:44 AM, John Occhipinti wrote:
So what do they base their statements on, if they do not have another antenna to compare it with?

Perhaps a study of the physics of how antennas work might be a good starting point. The ARRL Handbook, the ARRL Antenna Book, and the ON4UN book are a good starting point. So is some time with a good modeling program, like NEC or 4NEC.

Here's a tutorial on how vertical antennas compare with horizontal antennas based on extensive, disciplined modeling. When I presented this to our contest club, several of the more experienced operators said it is in agreement with their experience.

http://k9yc.com/VertOrHorizontal-Slides.pdf

73, Jim K9YC


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>