TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] INFORMATION ABOUT VERTICAL ANTENNAS

To: "tentec@contesting.com" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] INFORMATION ABOUT VERTICAL ANTENNAS
From: Jim Vohland <n9vo@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 17:29:36 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I never said they wouldn't. Just that I have them. It might work just fine 
without. 


> From: Rick@DJ0IP.de
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:11:27 +0100
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] INFORMATION ABOUT VERTICAL ANTENNAS
> 
> Gentlemen, you are incorrect.
> Verticals work just fine without any radials at all.
> 
> Now let's all get on the same page:
> 
>  >> A Quarter Wavelength Vertical requires the kind of radial network you
> guys have been talking about.
> 
>  >> A Half Wavelength Vertical does not require any radials.  It is a bear
> to match and difficult to control the Common Mode Current, but it does not
> need radials.
> 
>  >> A Center-Fed Vertical Dipole (1/2 wavelength long) does not require any
> radials and does not have any significant Common Mode Current problems.
> 
>  >> For that matter, a very short Openwire-Fed, Center-Fed Vertical Dipole
> does not require any radials at all but can be difficult to match on 80m...
> but it is easily doable with a Ten-Tec matchbox.
> 
> But to say a vertical requires radials is wrong.
> 
> One of the best limited space, low profile antennas is a center-fed,
> openwire fed short vertical.  You can work all bands with it, with 40m and
> above working quite well, albeit 80m is a bit down from a full size
> horizontal, but at least you are on the air on that band.  THIS is how you
> make a vertical work efficiently when your tiny yard has no room for
> radials.
> 
> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of P C Andy
> Anderson
> Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2016 7:57 PM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] INFORMATION ABOUT VERTICAL ANTENNAS
> 
> For vertical to work at all it needs RADIALS. I have found that 30 radials
> is a min and 60 is best.
> 73' Andy, W3LI
> 
> 
> > Subject: [TenTec] INFORMATION ABOUT VERTICAL ANTENNAS
> > 
> > I have been getting a lot of questions about my Vertical Antenna. I 
> > speak purely from my own personal experience of being an Amateur Radio 
> > Operator for the past 39 years.
> > 
> > My 42 foot Hygain All Band Vertical is just 1 of my antennas. I also 
> > have a
> > 
> > Hygain Long John 4 Element 20 Meter Monoband Beam, 50 feet high on a 
> > Universal Aluminum Tower and a
> > 
> > Radio Works Full Wave Loop All Band Antenna.
> > 
> > I also use an Ameritron AL-1200 Legal Limit Amplifier.
> > 
> > Let me address my Vertcal Antenna setup. It is 42 feet high and I have
> > 30 radials, with each radial being 35 feet long, going out in a fan 
> > type direction, for a total of over 1000 feet of radials.
> > 
> > When I am running the TEN-TEC 20 meter SSB net, I use my Monoband
> > 20 meter beam. When I switch to my Full Wave Loop, the signals drop about
> 2dB.
> > When I switch to the Vertical Antenna the signal drops around 5dB and 
> > the weaker stations cannot be heard.
> > 
> > When I am running the TEN-TEC 40 meter net, I use the Full Wave Loop. 
> > When I switch to the Vertical Antenna the signal drops about 4 to 5 dB 
> > and the weaker stations cannot be heard.
> > 
> > The VSWR is good on all antennas, so the point I am trying to make is 
> > that my Vertical Antenna is a compromise antenna for me at my location.
> > 
> > I know that I have worked many stations using a Vertical Antenna and 
> > the people "swear" by them. Most of these people live in restricted 
> > zone areas and cannot put up a beam/tower or a long wire or dipole.
> > 
> > So what do they base their statements on, if they do not have another 
> > antenna to compare it with?
> > 
> > I know that some Vertical Antenna users will not agree with me and 
> > that is their right to do so. I just wanted to respond with a blanket 
> > post to address all those who have been contacting me about Vertical
> Antennas.
> > 
> > I have never lived in a restricted zone area or sub-divison, but I 
> > still can empathize with those who are forced to use Verticals and 
> > Flagpoles or even Wires in their attic. If this works for you, I say 
> > God bless you for finding a way to get your signal out and enjoy your
> hobby.
> > 
> > Thank you for your time.
> > 
> >  John D. Occhipinti, K3UR
> > Net Manager, ten_tec Amateur Radio Nets
> > 
> > QRZ Page:  http://www.qrz.com/db/k3ur
> > 
> > Group Owner, ten_tec Amateur Radio Net Group 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ten_tec_radio_net/
> > 
> > SoundCloud:  
> > https://soundcloud.com/john-occhipinti-k3ur/sets/brotherjohns-most-pop
> > ular
> > 
> > Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/john.occhipinti.14
> > 
> > You Tube:  https://www.youtube.com/my_videos?o=U
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>                                         
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
                                          
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>