TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Service

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Service
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:30:34 -0800
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On Wed,1/6/2016 2:12 PM, Mike Stricker via TenTec wrote:
If a company relies up revenue for repairs to stay in business, then they don't 
deserve to be in business.

But if they LOSE money on service, they won't stay in business either.

Note that the discussions on this topic on this reflector have mostly been about radios that are old enough to be considered ancient by most manufacturers. YOU may think it's reasonable to maintain a 30 year old rig, but don't be surprised if it turns out to be expensive. I've managed to keep my 35 year old Ten Tec Titan amps running by working on them myself, and they have proven to be VERY dependable amps. But I can do that because they 1) are very well designed, 2) built with good components, 3) are well documented, and 4) use only generic discrete transistors. But I'd probably be SOL if I had to replace band switches!

Think about it -- when you do enough damage to your 10 year old vehicle in an accident that it costs more than it's market value to repair, the insurance company is going to pay you that market value, which will be a pretty small fraction of what you paid for it.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>