To: | n4py3@earthlink.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] How to Choose an SDR RX for the Pan-Adapter? |
From: | Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 26 Dec 2014 18:28:54 -0500 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I found the N4PY control program to be 1) easier to set up, and 2)
quicker to get reliable and stable - compared with LPB2. Not that the
latter does not get it right, but it just went smoother the first time
out with the N4PY program.
Just My take. -------------------------- K8JHR -------------------------- On 12/26/2014 12:51 PM, Carl Moreschi wrote: Also, my N4PY software fully supports LPPan and interfacing to NaP3 without using LPBridge. LPBridge sometimes can create timing problems. _____________________________________ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] RX320D Sold, Marty Hartwell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] How to Choose an SDR RX for the Pan-Adapter?, Barry N1EU |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] How to Choose an SDR RX for the Pan-Adapter?, Carl Moreschi |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] How to Choose an SDR RX for the Pan-Adapter?, Barry N1EU |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |