| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR |
| From: | "ChasW3KC" <w3kc@verizon.net> |
| Reply-to: | ChasW3KC <w3kc@verizon.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Dec 2014 16:22:50 -0500 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Carl N4PY posted: .... Noise Reduction (NR) is a completely different function. It has only been around since DSP starting becoming used in radios. It works by attempting to find an algorithm that can identify speech and try to remove audio not detected as speech. There are many different algorithms for this with many manufacturers having their own proprietary algorithm ... Do any of the DSP NR algorithms or schemes favor CW?73 Chas W3KC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR, Carl Moreschi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR, Carl Moreschi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR, Carl Moreschi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR, Carl Moreschi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |